Editorial Columns

How Big Of A Deal Is AEW?

Adam Van Winkle discusses the rise of All Elite Wrestling and asks how big of deal can AEW become.

If the high highs of the Attitude era marked by the most lucrative champion of all time, Stone Cold Steve Austin, is any indication, Vince needs competition, plain and simple. 

Okay, let’s say WWE. HHH, Stephanie, Shane, and the creative team undoubtedly get some decision making power, though rumor has it everything still runs by Vince for approval, down to the Titan Tower lunch menu.  Point is, WWE was at its best when legitimate and distinct brands like WCW and ECW could push them for competition.  Left to its own devices, the WWE product can become very, very stale (I’m looking at you, MITB winner Brock Lesnar).

The thing is, the WWE seems to know this on some level.  It’s why they’ve done brand splits in the past and currently, it’s why NXT and 205 Live exist, to turn what would be part of a normal pecking order in a single wrestling company into three distinct levels. It’s a nice effort, but here’s the rub: it ain’t working.

In April, Monday Night Raw set not just one but two record lows in viewership for non-holiday, non-football season Raws.  This came on the heels of a ten percent drop in WWE stock and a first quarter financial shortage for investors.  With Smackdown set to move to Fox this fall, WWE is doing anything but riding high right now.

Why the loss of interest so quickly after Wrestlemania?  I can’t help but think it has something to do with Cody and the coming of All Elite Wrestling.  Is it a coincidence that Raw has hit its low points in the weeks leading up to Double or Nothing this Saturday?  Maybe, but looking back at the history of the WWE’s competitors, I say not.

Compare ECW and TNA for example. ECW pushed WWE to the point that Vince had to acquire them (after trying for a couple of years to imitate them with the hardcore division). ECW and Paul Heyman had original ideas and style, and pushed underutilized wrestlers and home grown talent rather than just the WWE and WCW’s fallen stars. Mick Foley first caught on in ECW after a lackluster run as Cactus Jack in WCW.  Stone Cold came out of ECW after switching from his WCW “Stunning Steve” persona.  Rob Van Dam came out of ECW as homegrown talent. 

On the other hand, TNA began as a rehash really.  It was the Russo-Jarrett connection that ran WCW into he ground starting another promotion. Over the years they brought in Dusty Rhodes and Jim Cornette and Hulk Hogan and Eric Bischoff to run the show and have largely ignored the best of their own homegrown talent. Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy the hell out of Samoa Joe and AJ Styles and – no offense to the Young Bucks – the Motor City Machine Guns have been my favorite tag team in the last fifteen or twenty years. However, when it came time to put someone over for the championship, TNA/Impact largely elevated the old WWE and WCW guard: think Christian, think Kurt Angle, think Sting, think Matt and Jeff Hardy. 

The point is when a company tries a distinct and entertaining approach, like ECW, it legitimately pushes WWE to be better through legitimate competition and all of pro wrestling benefits.  For further proof, watch the Monday Night War documentary series on the Network about a time when a combined 8-10 million viewers tuned in weekly for Monday Night Wrestling on either Raw or Nitro (compared the dismal 2.16 million Dave Meltzer reported for the April 29th Raw last month).  The most compelling point there again is how WCW’s switch to a “reality-based” approach of using “normal” names—Scott Hall instead of “Razor,” Kevin Nash instead of “Diesel”—with less gimmicks and more blue jeans again pushed the WWE to change radically it’s cartoon character approach in the Attitude era. Additionally, WCW’s brilliant launch of the cruiserweight division broke down barriers for size that persist to this day.

So, do we have reason to be hyped for AEW? Is it TNA or is it ECW? 

At this point, I’m inclined to think it’s going to be the latter.  Cody and AEW have been very smart in promoting wrestling talent and acquisition of work-rate over characters and gimmick. Cody’s response and promo to  Dustin’s video after the announcement of the Cody vs. Dustin matchup of Dusty’s boys at Double or Nothing focused completely on distancing from the WWE:

“This match is generation vs. generation,” said Cody, “I’m not here to kill Dustin Rhodes. I’m here to kill the Attitude Era. My entire life, my whole class of peers has been compared to late 90’s to early 2000s for over a decade and it’s a sham. Sure, you’ve paved the roads for us, but you set the speed markers at 35 because you’re fucking terrified of any of us putting our foot down on the pedal… You mean to tell me some pissant bodybuilder making everything a no DQ, meandering around the crowd, throwing the jib cam at his opponent compares to a Kenny/Okada match? Or some bra & panties spectacular can match up with what the women did last September 1st (at All In). Even Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, as electric as it was, was it really better than what [CM] Punk said sitting on that stage?”

He couldn’t be more clear in his intentions with AEW.  He wants to reward quality in-ring action over soap opera and spectacle.  He wants to bury the idea that gimmick is needed to get guys over.

No doubt this is why AEW is guaranteeing unscripted promos from the wrestlers.  This is the way true talent, like Cody’s dad, used to get over.  They won the crowd through personality and voice that was genuine to that wrestler. The WWE has become such a TV show that writers sit around a table and script nearly every word of promos.  It creates inauthentic voice.  Look at Roman Reigns—has that guy ever looked genuine or sounded authentic in a promo?  Don’t look too hard—the answer is absolutely not. Stone Cold and the Rock got over in the late 90s because they were genuinely funny, and the only times they weren’t was after WWE realized how funny they were and tried to beat us over the head with it (I’m thinking that WWE music album with the Rock’s “Pie” song that blatantly referenced vaginas a lot). A couple of the most lauded promos of the last decade in WWE were CM Punk’s unscripted sit down on the stage, and the recent unscripted heel turn of Sami Zayn.  They are lauded because the fans didn’t feel like they were eating a bowl of WWE creative’s bullshit. The fans ate it up because it was the wrestler getting his own voice over, not one being forced on the wrestler and the fans, like John Cena as Punk pointed out.

AEW has signed many of the best. Omega, Jericho, the Young Bucks, Christopher Daniels, and many more on the roster have been regarded as some of the best in-ring workers of this generation. In this respect, they are focusing on ring talent and not body type or hype. It genuinely feels like Cody and AEW are not going to force the Cena and Reigns cartoon bodies and characters down our throats, and that feels like the most refreshing approach since…well ever. 

The biggest problem with wrestling has been, for a long time, the silliness of gimmicks. Remember when Hogan’s schtick started getting booed in 1995 in WCW because fans were just freaking over it? How many times did we have to watch another Hulk-up? It’s going to happen every time a generation of fans grows up.  Think about it: the reason WCW went reality based and WWE went for sex appeal in the late 90s was because the kids wrestling had hooked in the 80s were growing up and didn’t want the kiddie content anymore. Of course, we reverted back to a PG era in WWE once it bottomed out in the early 2000s. And, in many ways that makes sense: the WWE was once again going after kids and a new generation of viewers. 

Problem is, we’re coming up on 15 years past that and it is stale once again.  The kids it hooked in 2005 are growing up, and, just as we 80s kids in the late 90s wanted more sex and violence, these kids don’t want big bodies or gimmick shoved down their throat anymore, they want unique and skilled wrestlers that put on a more realistic product. Well, I’m speculating there because I’m not one of those kids, but I’ll say fans that were driven away by the WWE monolith, like me, and looked to the indies and NJPW for the good stuff, would at this point rather watch good in-ring action than the gimmicked to death stuff.  Roman Reigns vs. Elias at Money in the Bank is the height of that kind of no-talent dipshittery.

Enter All Elite Wrestling to fill the void.  How big a deal is this?  It’s everything.  No doubt wrestling was at its peak, its most watched, its most beloved, when two or three major brands competed and pushed each other to be better and better.

I won’t say AEW is going to save wrestling because I think wrestling will always exist in some local and mainstream forms.  But I am willing to wager (get it—Double or Nothing?) that AEW just might usher in the new wrestling boom period. And that is a big deal.

If you liked this article, please follow us on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram to follow all of our content that goes out daily.

You can find the author of this article on Twitter @GritVanWinkle. Thanks for reading!

Comment

To Top